by Anne Joos | Vol 38 (2) 2020
Het jaloerse subject benijdt het object van de ander maar het object van zijn jaloezie betreft het genot die de Ander ervan heeft. Het jaloerse genot (jalouissance) kan men begrijpen als vrees voor het verlies dat als het ware ‘verbouwd’ wordt in genot. Dit verlies is minder bepaald door de huidige scène van het jaloerse subject dan door het verlies inherent aan de taal. De positivering van het object geldt als beschermdijk tegen de fragiliteit van de symbolische verankering van het jaloerse subject.
by Jeroen Donckers | Vol 25 (1) 2007
This article deals with the necessary dynamic between the psyche or movement and the object. The notion of movement serves as a material conception of the psyche, in the same way as the drive, the life-drive and language are material: they exist on the basis of a mutual defining relationship to a support, to an object. This necessity (or thought) is considered from within psychosis. Using the poet Antonin Artaud as the movement is illustrated which is not defined by their grounding encounter with the object. With a neologism psychosis is named as ontrand, both in the sense of approach as well as in the sense of distancing. On the basis of a fragment of a case it is explained that, in a way that is different, it is up to the analyst or therapist to ontrand psychosis. In support of this ontranden the case is made for a sufficient continuing constellation of objects. This translation is offered as what Winnicott meant by transitional objects and phenomena.
